夫妻性爱技巧
近日,中国日报记者深度采访了手撕西方媒体的老外内森·里奇(@NathanRich暖锅大王)。
在中国的一些问题上,他说出了一些东说念主不想听到的声息,却被好意思国视频平台频频打压。
内森·里奇是优兔(YouTube)上的一位视频博主,恒久活命在中国。2018年底,他因制作挑剔视频而走红。
河南专技在线采访中,内森·里奇坦言我方在优兔上的视频被越来越频繁地降权、限流,几万的柔顺量和点赞数也每每隐痛“失散”。
内森·里奇告诉记者,他有关过优兔,“他们承认在打压我的账号,一切皆是专诚为之。”
They‘ve admitted that they are aware that they’re doing it and that everything is working as intended。
内森·里奇提供了多半笔据评释我方账号下的粉丝皆是真的真实的活粉,但优兔照旧找各式借口移除了这些粉丝数据。
On YouTube, I have about 450,000 subscribers。
在优兔上,我或者有45万粉丝。But on the front end, they only show you about 300,000 due to some issues, where they‘re intentionally hiding my subscriber count。
但在前端,由于某些原因,只知道约三十万粉丝。优兔成心磨灭我的粉丝数。
My videos get demonetized。 My subscribers get removed。 The likes get removed, the share count。。。 every metric of a success of a channel gets reduced。
我的视频被去掉告白,我的粉丝被移除,点赞被取消,共享数着落……每个权衡账号得胜的维度皆受到打压。更让内森·里奇大怒的是,优兔平台擢升了支撑中国分裂视频的权重。
As if they want to rub salt into the wound, another thing they do is they boost particularly pro-separatist videos in their ranks。
比喻说,淌若在优兔上搜索香港这个重要字,依时间章程摆设看到的应该是对于香港的最新视频,然后倒序一直到发布时候最久远的视频。
But instead, what I find is the first top five are the most recent, and then the sixth one is one from two months ago by a known racist person against Chinese people with less views than my pro-China video from two months ago。
但我看到的情况是,前五个视频是最新发布的,第六个视频是两个月之前的,是由一个反华种族宗旨者发布的,况兼浏览量不如我两个月前发布的支撑中国的视频。
内森·里奇“作念错”了什么?因为说了优兔不想听到的实话,是以他们想捂上他的嘴。 内森·里奇满腔大怒,在优兔平台,不错高呼“侨民应该被枪指着赶出好意思国”,不错叫嚣“白东说念主至上”,但是,独独不可罗致他对于香港的权衡。他说:“格外显著的是,优兔想要传递一种带有政事倾向的信息(they‘re trying to promote a political message)。”
The message that they‘re trying to cultivate is that they are on the side of Hong Kong, because Hong Kong is fighting for democracy and we have democracy and we want them to have a democracy, and so they are the righteous ones and everything that they’re doing is right。 We need to support them。
优兔想给东说念主们灌注一种想想,那即是,香港正在为“民主”立志,咱们是“民主”的,是以咱们要站在香港一边。香港抗议者是“正义”的,他们所作念的一切皆是“正确”的,咱们必须支撑他们。And I think there are several problems with that narrative and they don‘t want to hear it, and they don’t want others to hear it。
我认为优兔这种不雅点这是有问题的,但是他们我方不想听到别的声息,同期也不想让别东说念主听到。
在内森·里奇看来,优兔很可爱把我方塑变成一副“东说念主畜无害”的姿色,包装成一个所谓中立或者落寞的平台。
他们一面宗旨“言论解放”,一面黢黑操控推行,却无须对我方指挥的公论负职守。
I think it surprises some people that YouTube is actually active in the content。
有些东说念主可能会吃惊,因为他们不知说念优兔其实对于推行是有筛选的。
What YouTube is doing is they‘re trying to get the best of both of those worlds。 What they’re doing is they‘re controlling the content, but not taking responsibility for the content。
优兔企图两个低廉皆占了,他们在放胆推行却差别推行负责。
最让内森·里奇崩溃的是,巨头优兔形成摆布后就初始束缚打压新平台。这就意味着,@暖锅大王 除了在优兔发布视频,别无选拔。
The biggest problem with YouTube is that it does all this while it also tries to proactively crush all competition。 So it‘s established a monopoly on the Western media platforms。
优兔最大的问题在于它在这么作念的同期也在打压竞争敌手,在西方媒体平台上形成摆布。
So what that means is that somebody like myself, if I want to reach people in the West, I don‘t have any other options。
这就意味着,像我这么的博主淌若想赢得西方网友的柔顺,除了优兔别无选拔。
They are removing competition and crushing dissenting voices。 They‘re also not practicing their own freedom of speech。
他们扫清竞争、磨灭反对的声息,但也莫得践诺我方的言论解放的开心。
为何要手撕西方媒体在走访@暖锅大王 前,CD君在微博上发了一个网友问题搜集帖,其中有网友兴趣,内森·里奇算作一个好意思国东说念主,为何要在香港问题上手撕西方媒体呢?
内森·里奇直言,他即是但愿公共作念足作业再来权衡,摈斥偏见,把各方不雅点展现出来。但是西方媒体一再片面报说念,不肯意让另一方声息见光。
What I see from the West is overwhelmingly only one side of the Hong Kong issue。
我看到的是,西方在香港问题上充斥着片面的声息。
不久前,内森·里奇还看到一个好意思国征询员发了一条推特,说“这些抗议者何等和平,为什么会有东说念主以为他们在作念错事……”,显著他是只听到了片面的信息。
I‘ve seen videos of them dragging people out of cars and beating them on the street, throwing Molotov cocktails into police headquarters and all kinds of other violent actions。
我看过抗议者把东说念主从车里拽出来当街殴打的视频,他们往警员总局扔燃烧瓶,还有一系列其他的暴力行动。My message really is to be fair, to understand the situation and to be honest about the situation。
我想说的是媒体要保握公说念,蚁及格式并淳厚地报说念格式。
西方媒体在中国问题上骗东说念主相对容易
内森·里奇精采分析了西方的主流媒体谈及中国时会用到几种战略,很真理也让东说念主很不安(interesting and disturbing)。
“西方媒体仗着发生在中国的事情远,不好核实,是以为所欲为。”
It‘s quite interesting and disturbing to see because there’s so much of it going on that they actually create this bubble, where they know that no one‘s going to challenge them。 And so they get very sloppy and loose with their reporting。
这其实很真理但也令东说念主不安,因为一种报说念声息出现得太多了,他们就制造出了一个幻象。况兼他们知说念没东说念主会质疑他们,是以在报说念的时候就会愈加不严谨、予求予取。
而西方媒体报说念中国的方式淌若被用来报说念泰西国度的事情,那是统共不被允许的。
And they report in ways that they would never be allowed to report about American or British activities or news。 So they‘ll say things that are very easy to fact-check and see that’s totally wrong, and yet no one will check them。
他们在用一种报说念好意思英事务时毫不被允许的方式来报说念香港。其实他们的报说念很容易进行事实核实,惟有核实就会发现,他们说的是完全错的,但是并莫得东说念主去核实(香港新闻)。
他们只专注警方的法则反击却忽略暴徒的行动。
When we see rioters throwing Molotov cocktails into buildings and then getting tear-gassed, the reports from CNN will say police tear gas protesters。
咱们看见暴徒往大楼扔燃烧瓶,然后警方投掷催泪弹。CNN的报说念会说,警标的抗议者投掷催泪弹。
And then buried somewhere in the article, maybe they‘ll say “petrol bomb” somewhere in there。 But the point of the article, the headline, is that the police did something bad to these innocent protesters。 And so that’s one example of how they‘ll do things。
然后在著作某个避讳的场地提一句燃烧瓶,但整篇报说念大标题是警方对无辜的抗议者施暴,这即是他们报说念手法的一个例子。
Technically they‘re telling the “truth”, but they’re quite obviously emphasizing something in a way to deemphasize something else。
从技艺层面讲夫妻性爱技巧,他们报说念的似乎是“事实”,但显著他们刻意忽略某些方面,从而达到强调其他方面的后果。